11.06.2013

Tootsie Pops: a critical review

Friends,

I hope you have an iPhone 4s or 5 for two reasons: (1) I'm about to tell an iPhone story, and (2) iPhones are awesome (I want good things for you).

Like most iPhone owners, I had an initial period of fascination with Siri. Not with her relatively boring functionality, of course, but with her sassy personality. To try to tease this out, I asked her various popular questions to see her responses. For instance, I asked her "Who's on first?", and she aptly replied, "Correct. Who is on first."

One such question is related to our current topic. Check it out:

Oh, the days before I had 4G or could dictate question marks.

That this question has been researched by students at Cambridge raises dire concerns about the state of higher education worldwide. This terror notwithstanding, we forge ahead to the question at hand:

What's up with Tootsie Rolls?
Aside from Tootsie Pop anticlimax

There was a time when I loved Tootsie Pops. An age of innocence, when anything that had sugar filled me with delight. But times have changed ("relationships have become more sophisticated, females less cruel, skins thicker, instincts more developed"), and now I more or less demand that my food taste good from start to finish.

And therein ("as the Bard would tell us") lies the rub. The actual lollipop portion of a Tootsie Pop is pretty awesome, at least in whatever flavor one usually enjoys. I could pound the outside of cherry Tootsie Pops for days (an additional reason I will never buy a bag of them). But, like so many model homes and whitewashed tombs, what's on the inside is so much worse.

Does anyone actually like Tootsie Rolls? If you want to taste chocolate, you can more profitably eat any other chocolate product. In a pinch, you can just imagine the taste of chocolate. I think even that's better than eating a Tootsie Roll. 

Like, instead of giving you actual chocolate, Tootsie Rolls give you a faint semblance of chocolate in chewy-but-not-gooey form. It doesn't melt in your mouth or your hand, it just gets stuck in your teeth.

At least Blow Pops (bought out by the Tootsie Roll corporation in 1988) give you some utility at the end of the lollipop. That gum may only be enjoyable for 18 seconds, but hey, that's 18 seconds more than you're getting from a Tootsie Roll. At least the bubble gum isn't pretending to be edible.



I have two questions for you:
Can you think of a chocolate item worse than a Tootsie Roll?
Blow Pops or Tootsie Pops?

Jon



10.18.2013

Tangential Vignette -- The Hero

Friends,

As you probably know, Tangent Space(s) has existed thus far as a home for observations, ideas, and rants.  I've tried to be funny and thought-provoking as I share about things I love or hate.  I'm so glad you've read (and will hopefully keep reading!) these tangents.

Now I'm going to try something new: fiction!  Here's a short story I thought of today and hammered out.  Well, I don't think it's long or thorough enough to even be a 'short story'.  Let's go with 'vignette'.  I'm sure it's very improvable, but I don't have the patience to work on it more.  So here it is, in its raw, untested, original form--the first Tangent Spaces(s) vignette.



The Hero

          Our hero strode forward confidently. Something near this city sidewalk was emitting a foul odor that smelled faintly of garbage. Our man, though he was too busy to think twice, or look once, on the source of the smell, decided that it ought to be removed. If it weren't for heroes like ours, one wonders if a world containing such foul smells would even be worth having.
          Lo! A wind blew just then, taking the stench with it! The breeze, though, was a cruel master; as it blessedly delivered our champion from the odor, it brought its own affront. The hero had worked hard that morning, as was his custom, to meticulously craft an appearance that communicated, “I don’t care how I look, but I actually sort of obviously do.” If the wind ravaged his hair, his look would simply express, “I don’t care how I look.” Half his work would be lost.
          He shook it off and continued his pace, smiling wryly. He had mastered the hallowed art of responding to frustration with a wry smile. And so he strode on, grinning ironically and sipping his coffee. The drink was as regular to his mornings as the careful grooming. But he didn’t need the stuff. Though he was too humble to say it aloud, he thought perhaps the coffee needed him; for what is a drink if it doesn't have someone to drink it while striding ahead confidently?
          This made our conqueror recall, behind his disheveled hair and mocking smile, the unusual time he had ordering that cup of coffee.


          The line had been somewhat longer than usual, and our man, though he’s too patient to say it, has always hated a long line.
          One worker, trying to hurry the process, asked him, “Hello [shchsh]ir, can I get [shchsh]omething [shchsh]tarted for you?”  The question was roughly half words and half saliva.
          Eyes wide, he muttered, “Wow,” so that only the guy next to him in line could hear him.  That—saying things so that only one person could hear him—was another discipline he’d worked hard to master.
          But to the barista he simply said, “Medium coffee, please,” while thinking, Poor thing.  Did your school not have a speech therapist?  Though he was too modest to admit it, sympathy was one of his more heroic qualities.
          He suddenly remembered how skillfully he’d dropped that one word to the man beside him, so he shot a sidelong glance (another talent) to gauge the man’s response.  To the hero’s chagrin, the man stared blankly ahead.  Was he a statue?  Didn’t he realize he’d just been blessed with comic gold?  Dullard.
          When he finally received the drink, our man once again proved his mettle.  As he began to turn away, he casually said, “Thank[shch].”  It was just subtle enough that it wouldn't be noticed by the girl, but he hoped it might somehow break through to Mr. Stoic.  Either way, he was supremely pleased; making fun of someone to their face without the person’s awareness was the ultimate coup among his people.

          It was probably this fond reminiscence that caused the accident.  Our hero, of course, had somewhere to be.  This caused his already confident stride to be faster than normal, and a quick pace requires an attentive eye.  Our man no doubt knew this simple fact, but while in the glory of one’s memories, one often forgets simple things.
          And so, while rounding a corner, our hero collided with a pole.  The coffee, still mostly full, emptied onto the man’s shirt, neck, perfect stubble, eyes.  This caused, among other responses autonomic, a dropping of an important folder and the emptying of that folder’s important documents.  Important things quickly forgotten, the man clutched at his burning eyes.  Folder, papers, empty cup, and then the man himself hit the sidewalk.  In the collapse, the man’s head (looking more unkempt by the second) hit the wall of a building.
          Perhaps even more curious than the bizarre sight was the progression of thoughts in the fallen hero’s mind.  ‘Help! I need help!’ gave way to ‘I wish Lispy were here to help me. Or maybe Statue Man.  He looked strong.’  It occurred to him what a comeuppance this would truly be.  Comeuppance is a funny word.  It almost doesn't seem real. 
          He labored to look left, then right.  His face burned, his head hurt, and he was having trouble concentrating.  He looked again.  He very badly wanted that comeuppance if it meant help, even from someone who couldn't say esses or appreciate a good joke.  Comeuppan[shchsh]…
          But no help came just then.  He offered up one last laugh to his wit as he slowly closed his eyes, noting the faint smell of garbage.


10.15.2013

Dream Journal: Month 1 Overview

Friends,

I've written in the past about the awesomeness of dreams. The topic came up again about a month ago in a group setting, and a friend taught me some ridiculous but fascinating theories (maybe more than theories?) about dreaming, particularly lucid dreaming. 

One example: if you want to have more lucid dreams (dreams in which you're aware that you're in a dream), cultivate a habit of looking at your hand while you're awake. This might cause you to look at your hand within a dream. And, as the theory goes, in a dream you won't have the right number of fingers. If you notice this discrepancy, you'll possibly realize you're in a dream and (ta-da!) welcome to lucid dreamland.

I came out of that conversation with one thought, a thought that has led to this blog post: "I need to keep a dream journal."


Dream Weaver
And by 'weaver' I mean 'journal', but you gotta love the Gary Wright tune

The idea is pretty simple. I just keep a piece of paper and a pen next to my bed. Any time I wake up in the middle of the night or morning and I have a memory of a dream, I write down a summary. All other benefits (like increasing my lucid dream capability) aside, it's just really fun.

But I've found there are several distinct types of entries in my drournal (that's not going to catch on, is it?). There are basically three categories:

  1. The chicken-scratch hieroglyphic?  These dream summaries come from deep (way down deep) in the middle of the night, those groggy hours where light and rational thinking dare not go. I have no memories of these dreams, and in many cases I can't even read the handwriting.
  2. The remembered dream.  These entries are marked by decent penmanship and a memory of what actually happened in the dream. But sometimes it's just one detached, miscellaneous scene.
  3. The Homeric saga.  These epic synopses usually come in the morning when sunlight is in my room and I can see what I'm writing. They sometimes involve 2 or 3 separate dreams I've had over the course of the night. These are the dreams you daydream about.

As this is just an overview, I'll limit the number of examples I share. But I want you to get a picture of what my dreams and descriptions are like, so share I will...

1. Indecipherable nonsense 

  • "sleeping at Mom's ['char'], not quite right"
  • "in movie; lightning fight; the girl "[scribble scribble] PG-13"."
  • "Wheeling Park High School fire evacuation. Fill out form for firefighters"
  • "[Seth Myers] Jim Carrey, my Dad, Zach, and me in movie scene at a beach hotel"
2. Fleeting memories

  • "Chris shows me innovations in channel surfing"
  • "Pirates vs. 'Chicago Reds'; I run into Michael Jordan, who tells me McCutchen is out with an injury"
  • "Mike and I do a huge group presentation in a gym about Tangent Space(s)"
  • "Bob swims with a missile as swimming training from his in-laws"
  • "car drive-thru laser tag game"
3. Near-unbelievable epics
  • "Movie trilogy -- zombie attack. In hotel, shoot zombies in throat. Two factions-- guy from Eureka (not my faction). Joke -- 'I like your annotation...'." /// In this dream, I was in the first movie of a zombie trilogy. I made the important discovery in an elevator that you must shoot the zombies in the throat to permanently kill them. Two human factions emerged, one in favor of total war and one in favor of exploring other avenues. The leader of the war faction, played by an actor from the sci-fi show Eureka, made his point by joking in response to my 'shoot the throat' discovery that he liked my annotation on killing the zombies, and that we should form a few sub-committees to decide whether or not to act on that finding.
  • "Barney/Ted house, statue, fake face, theft. Fight --> real house." /// This tiny description summarizes an epic dream of deception. I was Ted from How I Met Your Mother, and Barney Stinson (played by Neil Patrick Harris) tricked me into wandering through a strange house. He eventually took off a fake face and revealed himself, and we got into a physical altercation. I went back for revenge the next day, only to find a family living in the house! The family called the cops when they discovered me in their home.

So far I'm not convinced the frequency or quality of my dreams has changed noticeably, but it's cool to be able to remember more of my dreams. Without a dream journal, I'm pretty sure I dream every night, but I almost never remember them. Now I do-- or at least I wind up with some funny writings.


The shared dream
I pretty much made it through this entire post without one reference to Inception

Do you remember your dreams? If so, what's a crazy one you've had?

What do you think of keeping a dream journal?

Jon


9.17.2013

But HOW is it going?!?

Friends,

It's getting old, how I keep taking a few months off from blogging only to come crawling back to you begging for your forgiveness, comments, and blog ideas. And so instead of groveling and pleading for those three things (but mainly the last two, if you wanted to know), I'm just going to forge ahead. 

And forging ahead, at the moment, is looking pretty exciting. I've accumulated some potential blog topics, and I'm ready to get back to more frequent Tangential adventures. And I should have plenty to write about, as I'm currently planning my wedding (which is, of course, a nicer-sounding way of saying that my fiancee is planning my wedding). I'll keep you posted soon on whether we plan to commit any of the cardinal sins of lame weddings: parts one two three.

But after such a long break, I think I need to ease back into the blogosphere. So I hope you'll join me as I inspect one of the least helpful phrases ever spoken by human beings since the dawn of verbal communication.


Answer my question!!!
With information that wasn't already implied by the existence of my question, punk

We often speak in pleasantries. "Small talk". I've gone on record that I don't really like this practice to begin with. But let's lay that argument aside. Small talk is a part of life. And occasionally, it's an annoying and baffling part of that life.

One of the most common questions when getting into small talk gear is, "How's it going?" While in this pure form the question is undeniably vapid (sorry, I forgot I was getting off that soapbox), the phrasing is often used for very real moments of inquiry:

How's the new job going?
How's it going living with your in-laws?
How's the crusade against "How's it going?" going?

These are real questions meant to initiate segments of conversation. But one common phrase, somehow only becoming more popular by the minute, stops these blossoming conversations dead in their tracks. In case you haven't Sherlocked it yet, I'm talking about

"Oh, it's going..."

Yeah, I know it's going. That's why I asked how it's going. Like, when you know there's something, but you want to know more about that thing, so you ask a question about it... that's not some secret way of asking if the thing exists.

How was the movie last night?
Oh, it was a movie...

What do you think of DiCarlo's pizza?
Oh, DiCarlo's has pizza...

What time is the baseball game?
Oh, the baseball game occurs at a time...

This is a total non-answer. Yeah yeah, I'll make a few concessions:

  • Usually there's a widening of the eyes and a sad nod of the head accompanying this verbal waste of time. This, I think, is meant to imply that the thing in question is progressing in an intense or cumbersome way. But I'm not a mind-reader, people.
  • Sometimes people do follow it up with real information. "Oh, it's going... my mother-in-law keeps making pointless small talk with me, so I try to spend a lot of time at the new job or eating DiCarlo's pizza during baseball games." But sometimes people don't even do this; they seriously just say that it's going. And even when they do elaborate, it makes the opening phrase pointless. It becomes just an annoying filler akin to "It is what it is" or "Can I ask you a question?"

"Tell me how you really feel."
Not sure if I stressed this enough: comments and blog ideas

Have you committed the grave error of saying "Oh, it's going..."?

Which everyday phrases bother you?


From an ESL website: "People who ask this phrase are usually trying to start a conversation."



7.02.2013

The Curse of the Doppelganger

Friends,

[Disclaimer: it will be important for you to know that I'm totally fine with the way I look. I'm confident in who I am. Any stories I tell and jokes I make are in good humor and meant to entertain. But still, learn what you can, people.]

We all like to think that the little storylines in our lives are epic. That our crises are the stuff of legends. That our banter with our best friends is Gilmorian. One day the laughable words come out of our mouths: "They should make a movie of my life."

This, of course, gets the wheels turning about who would play us (and all the other key players in our legendary lives) in our movie. This celebrity looks like me, but this one has my personality, etc. We brainstorm about the best actors to portray our friends, enemies, and frenemies. And that's fine; don't get me wrong, those conversations are fun. Just one thing...

Don't put me in your movie.

You should be played by Poop-Face!
As far as I know, there's no celebrity named Poop-Face; but if there is, someone has likened him to me.

It's always fun that first moment when someone says, "You look JUST LIKE so-and-so!!" But I've found that in my experience, these words echo off the mountains of self-image and trigger an avalanche of despair.

It started in high school, when a girl told me I looked just like one of her friends. She even had a yearbook picture of the dude to prove to me the uncanny resemblance. I of course don't have an actual photo of the guy, but if my memory serves (and I think you'll see it does), he looked something like this:

But he was voted most likely to succeed!


Then I got to college. My Psych 101 TA was obsessed with the idea that I looked like a guy on a reality TV show. I didn't watch the show and didn't know what the guy looked like, but I had learned my lesson in high school-- just smile, say, "Ok, cool," and walk away. 


But alas, this TA was both a bad teacher of and a bad example of psychology, and she insisted that the similarity was so remarkable that it warranted a picture to be brought up on the projector screen. The celebrity was Mikey from American Choppers and this (left) is more or less what he looked like in 2003.







Now, ironically, as I've gotten bigger and beardier and he's gotten smaller and beardier over the years, we now do look pretty similar. But during my freshmen year, when I was going through my (awesome [don't argue with me]) phase of growing out my hair, our long blonde hair was the only resemblance.

I'll spare you the details of the many other times people have cut me to the core with their confidence that they'd found my doppelgangers. But I'll give you the most recent one, because it's what reminded me to blog about this and is probably the most horrendous cruelty of all. A guy recently asked me if I'd ever been told I look like fantasy author George R.R. Martin. "No," I said, "probably because no one knows what that guy looks like."

But the guy talking to me had the last laugh, because moments later I looked up the novelist on Wikipedia to find this:




Oh yeah! Back to imaginary movie-casting. Here's the challenge of trying to cast me-- I'm big, burly, bearded, bear-like, betc., and there just aren't really any actors who get famous looking like that. So it's hard to find a well-known actor who looks anything like me. This usually creates a funny moment, though, when people are rattling off look-alikes for others in machine gun style then get to me and furrow their brow. Maybe they've taken a break from the game to ponder the implications of time travel.

There are only two guys ever suggested for me: Zach Galifianakis and Kevin James. The former because he has a full beard and the latter, I think, because he's the largest famous actor since Chris Farley. I don't take offense to either one, but given how dissimilar I actually look to Kevin James, it does sort of smack of "you're both fat."

Both of those guys are hilarious, though, so it could be worse.


Okay, fine, let's play
But again, I insist we leave out Poop-Face


Who would you want to play YOU in a movie?

Jon

6.04.2013

The Ethics of Trail Mix

Friends,

Rather than just apologize for the hundredth time about how it's been almost a month since our last Tangent, I'm going to apologize AND vent my frustration. 

Sorry it's been so long. When I started this blog adventure (not to be mistaken with "adventure blog", which I would take to mean a blog about hiking and mountain bikes, which this most certainly is not), I had a handful things I needed to write about. Pro baseball realignment. The good and the bad of being single. When Harry Met Sally, both as a chart topper and a source of relational wisdom.

The problem is that my pool of ideas, while vast, has more or less run dry. Don't panic-- Tangent Space(s) will live on. But I just want you to know, faithful reader(s(?)), that I've used up all my go-to rants about dog crap and traffic merging. From here on out, the regular exchange of ideas that is TS(s) will depend on my discipline and your help with ideas. The former is practically non-existent, so yeah... please help me.

In the meantime, I tackle a problem that is reprehensible, heinous, outright egregious... to my friend Bob. For some reason. I'm going to try to be angry for him.


M&Ms and Human Depravity
Trying to think of some joke about melting in your mouth, not in your hand; failing to do so

If you've ever been to a party, you've probably been to a party with trail mix. If I had my own rant to deliver, it would probably be about how crappy trail mix is. It shouldn't exist. Or maybe its existence should be relegated to the "trail". But this is Bob's rant, and so for the sake of tangentment, please picture a bowl of trail mix at a party.

Now, the thing about trail mix is that it attempts to mix salty and sweet. In one bowl, you find peanuts, cashews, almonds, granola, raisins, a bunch of other crap, and M&Ms. But you're at a party and it's 9pm. You're not interested in protein just now. Fiber is not a high priority. You want chocolate and you want it bad.

This, then, is the trail mix party dilemma-- on a dish serving as a public medley, you are interested in one and only one item.

There are obviously three options before you: eat nothing, eat the trail mix evenly in all its heterogeneity, or pick out and eat the M&Ms.

I'm afraid now we must say the hard truth. Many may disagree. But "sometimes the hardest thing and the right thing are the same" (that's for my mom, who has always loved that lyric from The Fray). Here it is, friends. Only the first two options are ethically permissible.

What's wrong, you might ask, with eating only the M&Ms? The answer is simple-- you ruin the trail mix for everyone else. Suppose the trail mix is 10% chocolate and 90% lame stuff. It won't take you long to eat all 10 of those percents. What you leave behind is an almost-full bowl that has become an abomination. 

You might respond with some hopeful thought that the mix and/or chocolate will be replaced. But that simply won't happen, because the bowl will be 90% full! The host won't even notice the change (unless shis hand scoops out the 'lame mix'), and no refill will take place.

This leads me to the point I want to make, the one part of this, umm, important problem that carries over into other parts of life. The violator of the trail mix dilemma typically isn't trying to be cruel, greedy, or self-centered. They legitimately just take the chocolate without thinking about the ramifications.

And that's the problem. In all our actions, large and small, we should be thinking about the ramifications. Will this affect other people? How will it make them feel? Will it make their lives better or worse?

When you eat all the M&Ms and nothing else, it affects us. It makes us feel sad. It makes our lives worse.


Trail Mix and You
Leave comments. It's sort of an "if you build it, they will come" principle in 2 directions

Have you come up against a trail mix devoid of chocolate?
Have you ever broken the ethical code of party food?
Have you any ideas for future tangents?

Jon

5.09.2013

Reverse Engineering Our Worship Music

Friends,

My assumption is that most of you who chose to follow a Facebook link here are pretty familiar with the idea of 'worship music'. In the event, though, that a few of you haven't been to a Protestant Christian church, here's a brief summary: in most modern church services, one staple is a time of musical worship in which congregants, under the direction of a 3-to-8-piece rock band, sing songs to/about God with varying levels of liveliness, key changes, gestures, and flag-waving.

On the one hand, it's a simple enough process. As a group, we join together to give praise to God. We could (and at other times do) accomplish this same end through a group prayer, free of instruments or melodies. But since musical worship is common in the Bible, it's fun, and music is a medium that is emotionally engaging, we have today's world of "How He Loves Us" (and 1999's world of "The Heart of Worship"). 

But what really happens when we worship God in this way? What's happening in the unseen realm? What are the relationships among the words we sing, the thoughts in our heads, and God's response to us? Are the words we sing important, or just the state of our hearts? Could we just as easily worship Him with a song of "La La La"s or animal noises?

I don't know the answers to these questions. Maybe share your thoughts in the comments below. But for now, I offer you the one thing I have thought about in this area, and that's the words of our worship songs and the purposes they serve.



What's in a worship song?
For those times we're able to think about the words and not our voice or the person next to us

The phrases in worship songs seem fall into one of three categories:


1. True statements about God and/or me

Examples
"You are good when there's nothing good in me"; "I need You"; "You are mighty to save"; "Jesus paid it all, all to Him I owe"

Purposes
These are crucial, and ultimately I think songs can be made up entirely of these thoughts. Thinking rightly about God is one of the many ways we honor Him, and by singing these words, we reinforce our belief in them. It's natural to sing these things with a loving and grateful heart, which increases our intimacy with God. And if all else fails, simply honoring God with positive, true words about Him is worshipful.


2. [Admittedly false] statements about me that I'd like to be true (resolutions)

Examples
"I will worship with all of my heart, I will praise you with all of my strength, I will seek you all of my days, I will follow all of Your ways"; "Giving all I am to seek Your face, Lord all I am is Yours"; "Where You go, I'll go... I will trust in You alone... I will live for You alone"

Purposes:
There is always in the Christian life a healthy desire to look ahead. And while it will be completely by God's transforming power that our future will be more godly than our past, we still (again by His grace) bring to the table willingness, submission, and surrender. And so, these sung phrases allow us to express that future-looking surrender-- I will follow, I will obey, I even now give You all that I am.


3. Requests from God

Examples
"Give me faith to trust what You say"; "Refine me, Lord, through the flames"; "Let Your glory fall as You respond to us/ Spirit, rain/ Flood into our thirsty hearts again"

Purposes:
This is very similar to the purposes of the previous category. But these lyrics, serving as requests, focus not on our role of surrender, but the much more essential role of God as the one who actually brings about the things we want to see in our lives-- transformation, contentment, hope, etc. Note that while we greatly benefit from these blessings, they're ultimately all for the sake of God's glory.


This observation is probably not very profound. But I've already found it somewhat helpful in evaluating worship songs and, more importantly, to understand them while I'm singing them and thus worship God with more mental presence. 

In terms of evaluating, I simply am realizing I prefer songs that focus on the first or third categories, but not the second. Sure, it's important to make spiritual commitments and to be resolute, but that's not the sort of thing I feel the need to gather 'round and sing about. As for understanding what I'm singing, it's really nice for me to understand the connection between the different components of the song. Otherwise it can seem like a random connection of unrelated lines!

For instance, I can start to see the "big picture" of a song when I see what its various segments are and what they each mean. So a song's meaning might take on one of the following forms:

"God, in light of these truths about You and me [lyrics in category #1], I need You to work in certain ways [category #3]. As You do those things, may I become more of the person You want me to be [category #2]."

-or-

"God, I really need to work in this area [category #2]. Please provide all I'm lacking in this area [#3]. This whole process is worth it because of certain great traits of Yours [#1]."

Now, I'm not dissecting these songs phrase for phrase while I'm singing along in church. But once I've taken a little time to study the lyrics and understand more of how each line works toward the overall message, all future instances of singing that song seem to be enhanced. This may not be the case if you try this-- I know not everyone has my weird, analytic brain.

The Heart of Worship
I still think 'warship' for worship is one of the best typos possible

Please comment on anything in this post. If you need more direction, note the several questions at the beginning. Failing that, there are tons of YouTube links you could comment on. If you aren't understanding what's happening right now, I'm begging you to comment.

Jon

4.29.2013

A Pittsburgh Fast-Food Music Phenomenon

Friends,

At this point, I'm out of excuses for my long delays in blogging. All I can say is that if you want me to blog more often, please badger me when I'm delaying. And, if possible, bombard me with awesome blog topic ideas.

Today's post, though, has been a long time coming...

I spend a lot of time in restaurants and coffee shops. This is because I work from home a lot, and I've found that I'm a lot more productive "in a restaurant or coffee shop" than I am "from home". Places like this, to provide customers with a nice atmosphere, typically play music. And because these establishments want to attract rather than repel patrons, that music is usually in a commercial-free loop rather than a DJ/commercial radio station.

Since these patrons will be of all ages, the loop of music is typically 'multi-generational', spanning the decades. Yet it stays in the 'safe' genre of pop rock, eschewing polarizing niche genres like country and rap. Finally, because the paying patrons aren't young, the decades covered are usually the 70s and 80s, with a little 90s thrown in.

Which musical artists stand to gain most from this convergence of factors? Who was prolific in the pop genre from 1970 to 1995? Many names might come to mind: The Eagles, Elton John, Michael Jackson, etc. However, probably unbeknownst to you, one artist cranked out more playable tunes in that span than any other. And thus, that artist is played in eating establishments all over Pittsburgh on a daily basis.

In case you didn't peek below, or have an attention span of like 0.3 seconds and have already forgotten, that artist is Billy Joel.


The Billy Joel Theorem
I'm not kidding. This is a theorem.

You might be in disbelief. Billy Joel? To you, Joel might just be a former celebrity who drunkenly drives his car into houses. You might not be able to think of any of his songs. But trust me (I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night), he is the most played artist in public pop music loops.

In fact, I've postulated a pretty controversial theorem about just how often he's played:

The Billy Joel Theorem
If you spend any length of time in a Pittsburgh-area establishment that plays a loop of multi-generational pop music, you will hear a Billy Joel song.

You might be thinking, "What about if I just step inside the door of the establishment, then 1 second later I leave?" I theorize that you will be treated to 1 second of a Billy Joel tune.

No, obviously the theorem is false in its bold version above. But I maintain that Joel is the most frequently played artist in these loops. In case you're unfamiliar with his body of work, here are the songs (and their albums) I hear most often in restaurants (though they're not necessarily his best):

Piano Man (1973)
"Piano Man"

The Stranger (1977)
"Only the Good Die Young"
"Get it Right the First Time"

52nd Street (1978)
"Big Shot"
"My Life"

Glass Houses (1980)
"You May Be Right"
"It's Still Rock 'n Roll to Me"

An Innocent Man (1983)
"The Longest Time" (though I may prefer this version)
"Tell Her About It" (man, some of these videos are... interesting)

Storm Front (1989)
"We Didn't Start the Fire" (I'm pretty sure Ryan started it)

River of Dreams (1993)
"The River of Dreams"

[Other songs I occasionally hear include "Captain Jack", "She's Got a Way", "The Entertainer", "Movin' Out", "Just the Way You Are", "Allentown", "Uptown Girl", "I Go to Extremes", and "Lullabye (Goodnight, My Angel)".]

I know this is pretty sad as far as theorems go. But don't worry! In the spirit of facts and data and science, I will now begin logging all the songs I hear in these settings. I will identify the most played artists and songs. And (as soon as Billy Joel hits the top of the list I'm recording) I'll report back to you, TS(s) readers, and we will settle this hotly debated issue once and for all.


We're all in the mood for a melody...
or, at the very least, I'm in the mood for a bunch of blog comments

Are you a Billy Joel fan?
Which artist do YOU seem to always hear when you're in public?

Jon

3.21.2013

Pet Peeves: Pretentious Pronunciations

Friends,

Most words in our beloved language have but one pronunciation. Most words are simple and straightforward enough-- solid, sturdy words like "solid" and "sturdy". But a few words have gone rogue and, whether from British/American differences or miscellaneous pretension-baggery, feature an alternate pronunciation. I'm not concerned with words that have 2 (more or less) equal options, like caramel or garage. What really grinds my gears are words with one normal, accepted, perfect pronunciation and one that is steeped in pretense, condescension, and superiority... and, more specifically, the people who choose the latter.

As with any human endeavor, I enter this one with some level of hypocrisy. When faced with a choice between a common word whose meaning I know and a rarer one whose meaning is only partially clear to me, I sometimes go with the schmancy one. But I feel that my pretension is a little more justifiable-- I'm trying to expand my (and my listeners') vocabulary horizons. The person who chooses an alternate pronunciation, though, broadens only my frown.


Pretentious Pocket Dictionary
That's not to say anyone's pocket is foppish


foyer [foi-EY]
noun
  1. an entrance hall, especially one in which superior activities take place: Pray join me in the foi-EY for some scones and literary criticism.


mature [ma-TORE]
adjective
  1. exhibiting more development, especially intellectually, than others: Don't I sound more ma-TORE than you?


schedule [SHEJ-oo-uhl]
noun
  1. a series of things, especially intellectually superior ones, to be done: Sorry, my SHEJ-oo-uhl is full of things like monocle-wearing.


the (x+1)th century [instead of "the x hundreds"]
phrase
  1. the years x-hundred to x-hundred-and-99, especially the superior events from those years: During the... (pause to convert "1200s" to a century)... 13th century... (pause for listener to convert "13th century" to hundreds)... there was a dramatic rise in the eating of crumpets.

Okay, it's a short dictionary
At least it will fit in your ornate pocket

What other words belong in the PPD?
What pronunciation really grinds your gears?

Jon

3.07.2013

Top Five 90s Foods

Friends,

If you know me, you know I was a child of the 90s. The music, TV shows, and movies of that decade defined my childhood. As an '85 baby, I was perhaps perfectly situated in age to be 'raised' by Danny Tanner, MC Hammer, and Mufasa (and really, you can't argue with those role models).

But those parts of the 90s live on. Armed with Netflix and Spotify, anytime I want I can nostalgically reunite with Doug Funny or Seal. Other cherished elements of my early years, however-- like the foods and drinks I lived on-- exist only in memory. My distant, fading, shadowy memory. Sad face.

My Nostalgia Foods
If you track down any of #1, I will give you anything for it.

These five foods and drinks don't necessarily make the list because of their quality or taste. For some, yes, they were awesome. But for others, as you'll see, it's more about the niche they filled in our lives. Well, with that out of the way:



5. Dunkaroos

Think about this product: cookies you dunked in frosting. That's a straight-up dessert. Yet these gems somehow passed themselves off as snack foods and got put in kids' lunches. That kid was blessed, was the envy of the class, and for some reason was never me. I know it's weird, but I mainly miss this food because of the awesome jealousy it inspired in all of us. (This is technically still available, but not nearly as widespread as it once was.)


4. Surge

Okay, let's be honest for a second. Surge was more or less toxic sludge. It glowed an eerie green. It tasted slightly worse than most lemon-lime beverages. But the mythology!! Maybe it was the bright green can. Maybe it was the false rumors of near-dangerous caffeine levels. Whatever the reason, we thought Surge gave us magical powers of energy, speed, and alertness. And for that, I miss it a lot.


3. Crystal Pepsi

Crystal Pepsi was the product of a simple, brilliant idea: to make a colorless cola. The product failed miserably, presumably because our taste buds had been trained to expect Sprite or 7-Up when we brought a clear soda to our lips. But the effect of this swift failure is what makes me look back so fondly-- by '95 or '96, Crystal Pepsi was already 'a thing of the past', inspiring nostalgic, knowing expressions on our wise 10-year-old faces.


2. Rice Krispie Treats cereal

I hope, Reader, that you had a chance to eat this marvelous cereal. If you didn't, then you sadly can't imagine how delicious it is. You might be thinking, "I've had Rice Krispies cereal, and I've had Rice Krispies treats, so I can put 2 and 2 together." But that's so miserably wrong. That's like thinking that since you've had an apple and a graham cracker, you can imagine the taste of apple pie. Or that since you've had a lemon and worn a Band-Aid, you can imagine the refreshment of lemonade. But on the bright side, it may not be too late!! Some online forums claim this treasure is still available in certain eastern Pennsylvania grocery stores. 


1. Tropical Sprite Remix

This technically wasn't a 90s drink, as its near-miraculous inception came in 2003. But I can't make a list of amazing bygone food products without paying homage to TSR. This was commonly referred to as "liquid Skittles", as it was basically just Sprite with strong fruit (read: Skittles) flavor added. The funny thing is that I don't like Skittles. In fact, I don't even like Sprite very much. But something about this drink was heavenly. So much so that my friend Zach and I called it "the sweet nectar of life". We were goofy 18-year-olds. [And now, still calling it that, I guess we're goofy 28-year-olds.]



What were your favorite 90s food and drinks?

Were you ever sad when a food product was discontinued?

2.14.2013

#GETANOFFICE

Friends,

Fun fact: I've never had to interview for a job. I've had jobs -- real ones with health insurance and above-the-table payments -- but not one that's required an interview. Several positions were just crappy and didn't even merit an interview. Here's how my "real jobs" have started:

Teaching assistant: came with my grad school acceptance
Test-prep teacher: had to "audition" (literally), but not interview
College ministry: had to apply, but not interview

And so, I've been blessedly spared from sharing about a time I had to overcome adversity or my best experience of working with a group or a time when things didn't go as planned and I had to improvise.

I've also never conducted a job interview for others. Why, then, have I logged hours and hours in interviews? Why have I heard about valuable experience, office conflicts, career goals, skill sets, and blah blah blah blah blah?? It's simple, really...

I spend time at Panera.


Public Job [Inter/Re]views
It's up there with public breastfeeding

I've probably just read too much science fiction, but I'm starting to think Panera is somehow cosmically significant. Metaphysically unique. Something about the place serves as a beacon, irresistibly drawing in every officeless job interview in a 5-mile radius.

Like I said, too much science fiction.

But the fact remains that almost every time I'm in a Panera, a job interview (by an employer other than Panera) is taking place at the table next to me.

I mean, I get the draw of the place in general. A clean atmosphere, free internet, bread bowls, refills on delicious iced tea and even iced coffee... that's why I do my work there so often. But there's a big difference between my silent computer work and a job interview. Why are public interviews so inappropriate?

1. It's distracting for the patrons
When people go out to eat, they like to be able to enjoy food and conversation with minimal distraction. Sure, there will be people seated at the adjacent table, but you simply ignore them and go on. But when that nearby conversation is with people in suits asking each other about a time they showed flexibility in the face of unexpected change, it's hard not to get drawn in to hear the answer or watch the interviewee sweat bullets.

2. It must be jarring for the interviewee
Again, I've never done this whole thing, but I can only assume that when one prepares for an interview, shis focus is on eye contact and potential questions/answers. This preparation assumes a quiet, private setting; it probably doesn't factor in crying babies and Billy Joel songs.

But most of all...

3. It's awkward!!!
See below.

I was recently in Caribou, which for a while I'll be calling 'the new Panera', and one foot to my left there occurred a college intern's job review. My coworker Sara and I were silently working on individual things, when the internship coordinator to my left asked the intern a question...

*****
Boss: What's something you're excited about right now in the program?
Intern: Do you mean a project we're working on, or my own professional development?
Boss: Either one.
Intern: Um... ... hmm... ... uh... ... wow... give me a second... ... ...

I glanced up at Sara, needing to know if I was alone in this dark, hostile world of silence, unanswered questions, and sinking feelings in my stomach. Her eyes were already fixed on mine, a look of vacant, hopeless terror on her face.

Intern: ... sorry... ... ... ... I... ...I don't have an answer.

Sara's draw jopped and a confused whimper escaped her. I lost my grip on my pencil. It fell to the table as the world slowly faded from my mind, being replaced by that all-encompassing awkwardness.
*****

Sara and I survived that horrific encounter, but every day friendly, innocent patrons are attacked by similar bombs of awkward. This needs to stop. I don't have a great solution. I know these internship programs, non-profit organizations, and swimming pools don't have offices in which to interview applicants. But I think if you want to interview someone in person, it's your responsibility to either find a private place or, to return to my new favorite hashtag,

GET AN OFFICE!


Now I interview you
I think this is private enough?

Have you ever been interviewed in public?

Have you sat in on one of these Panera interviews?

Describe a time you had to overcome a workplace blah blah blah freaking blah...

Jon



2.07.2013

Third Annual Facebook Birthday Wall Post Analysis

Friends,

Two years ago, I decided to do a thorough (if unscientific) analysis of the Facebook wall posts people sent me on my birthday. [If you have tons of free time: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3] Then last year I revisited the subject with a new set of data and some encouraging conclusions. (Also, if you haven't yet, check out the comments on the 2012 post to read about how my initial study was a factor in a couple getting married!)

This year I considered abandoning the wall post analysis. It seems like I've beaten the crap out of that horse's corpse, and what does Tangent Space(s) offer if not the promise of something weird, interesting, pointless, and new?

What changed my mind?

The number of texts, remarks, and yes even wall posts, that communicated a fundamental misunderstanding of my stance on the birthday wall post.


What has been the point of all this?
Existential crisis much?

This year, before and during my birthday, many people said what amounted to: "I'm too nervous to write on your Facebook wall this year!" The perception seems to be that, because I obsessively blog about birthday wall posts, I must have some sort of wild, unattainable expectations for how awesome a post should be.

But this isn't the case at all! Have these people even read, re-read, and memorized my blog entries?! My thesis has never, ever been that people need to put a lot of time into the post or work really hard to make me laugh or cry. There are no high expectations here. My point has simply been that a personalized post is always significantly better than an unpersonalized post. This doesn't mean you have to write a sonnet or recollect our inside joke from 10th grade. It just means you should add to "Happy birthday" something-- anything-- that pertains to me and/or our friendship.

This could be the tiniest change. Consider the following two hypothetical posts:

Happy birthday, Jon!
vs.
Happy birthday, Jon! The Ravens suck.

The second one is so much better than the first, and it requires almost no special research, knowledge, creativity, or work. All that to say that making someone's birthday better is easy. And to say that the Ravens suck.

My 2013 birthday wall
It was a very good year.

After that stern bit of education, I want to thank everyone for making this my best Facebook wall birthday yet. I've streamlined the stats into just 'Personalized' and 'Not Personalized', though in the chart I do take special note of video/pictures and posts that mention this beloved blog.


To put these numbers into perspective, here are the results from my last 3 birthdays:

2011:   14% of posts were personalized
2012:   26%
2013:   28%


Your two cents
If you haven't already given me your life savings on this topic

What's your favorite type of birthday wall post to receive? Funny photos or videos? Inside jokes? Old memories? Or, um... "Happy birthday."

Jon